CFA Advantage
  Contents May 2005  
  Charterholder Profile  
  Employer Profile  
  Candidate Forum  
  CFA Advantage  

     
   

The Business of Relationship Management

Consultant William Horton, CFA, Tells Why His Firm Looks for the CFA Charter
By Christine Martin
 

   
    People. That’s what investment consultant William R. Horton, Jr., CFA, says he likes most about working in the investment industry. By that, he means not only the day-to-day interaction with clients and colleagues, but also his deep interest in how emotions and biases influence investors. This otherwise is known as behavioral finance.    
William R. Horton Jr., CFA
  Harvard graduate and former professional hockey player William Horton, CFA, now works with high-net-worth private clients in his investment consulting business. Horton earned the CFA charter in 1992 and he is engaged in behavioral finance research to gain greater understanding of investor decision making.
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

page top

          “I take a lot of pride in helping clients make investment decisions that are good for them,” says Horton, president of Horton Financial, an independent investment-consulting firm serving private clients and family offices in Canada. Horton says that doing so requires both the technical know-how to approach financial problems from various perspectives and also an understanding of the psychological drivers underlying a client’s investment behavior—skills that the CFA Program and, subsequently, CFA Institute member benefits have helped him to acquire.
        When Horton enrolled in the CFA Program, he already had several years of industry experience as a broker and financial consultant. “I thought the CFA Program would be a way to legitimize the knowledge that I had already. Instead, it expanded my knowledge; it gave me different ways to view, understand, and approach technical problems,” says Horton, who adds that from the beginning he found the curriculum to be applicable to his job.
        Another reason Horton pursued the program was because “the CFA charter was the standard that Canadian firms were looking for when hiring investment counselors.” Shortly after receiving the designation in 1992, Horton was hired as a portfolio manager for Royal Trust Investment Counsel. From there his career took off.
        By the late 1990s, Horton was a managing director of CT Private Investment Counsel, which at that time managed over US$8 billion. In 1999, Horton joined a boutique wealth management firm where he founded, registered, and was president of CAP Investment Management, the firm’s investment counsel arm, which grew to US$180 million in assets under management. And in 2001, he founded Horton Financial. His only regret: “I wish I had enrolled in the CFA Program sooner.”
   
 
  Horton pull quote
        Over the course of Horton’s career, he has made a point to keep up with industry developments. “In our field, working with uncertainty is part of daily life. Sure, there are standard ways of doing things and looking at situations, but sometimes they don’t work,” which, says Horton, obliges CFA charterholders to continue to build upon their knowledge base by reading industry publications and gaining exposure to new ideas and approaches. Doing so developed Horton’s style of investment consulting. “I’m not so certain I’d be as interested in applied behavioral finance today had I not gone through the CFA Program,” he says.
        Clearly, the CFA Program can take candidates in many directions. But no matter what the course, Horton says that paying attention to the people side of the business is essential to success. “One has to take a technical, left-brain approach when working in this business, but you ignore the right-brain side at your peril,” cautions Horton.
        Horton asks his investment counselors: “What kind of successful relationship have you ever been in that has been only one way?” Horton explains that “relationship management is not about having a nice customer database that tells you what kind of wine your customers like and where they like to go on vacation. You have to give a little to connect with people.” That advice applies not only to clients but to colleagues as well, says Horton.
        For example, Horton describes a recent investment manager search he conducted for one of his clients. “I shared with the finalist managers exactly what my client wanted, which surprised them, because typically the managers come in guessing. Often, they try to ferret out information about the client and try to tailor the presentation as best they can. Or, they just say ‘This is who we are and what we do,’ without concern for the individual client. But in trying to deliver to my client the best possible decision-making basis, I think it’s important to be up front with the managers. After all, it’s a transparency of process that contributes to a good decision. So in any relationship, I try as early as possible to set the tone of transparency, honesty, and integrity.”
        Ultimately, in his role as a consultant, Horton believes the biggest differentiator between a professional who is serving the client and one who simply is going through the motions “is having in-depth technical knowledge and the ability to translate that knowledge in a way that the client can understand and feel comfortable with it.”

 

   

Footnote:
Interested in the intersection of psychology and investment decision making? Consider these scenarios:

Scenario 1
In addition to whatever you own, you have been given US$1,000. You are now asked to choose between:

A. A 50 percent chance to gain US$1,000 and a 50 percent chance to gain nothing.

B. A sure gain of US$500.

Scenario 2
In addition to whatever you own, you have been given US$2,000. You are now asked to choose between:

A. A 50 percent chance to lose US$1,000 and a 50 percent chance to lose nothing.

B. A sure loss of US$500.

In a 1979 study* on decision making under risk, the above scenarios were presented to two different groups of subjects. Although the two scenarios are identical in terms of net gain to the subject, 84 percent of the subjects chose B in the first scenario, while 69 percent of the subjects chose A in the second scenario, thus demonstrating that people tend to avoid risk when profits are involved, but tend to be risk seeking when losses are involved. Horton says that how you frame a scenario for a client is very important in helping that person make sense of the options and commit to an investment strategy that both achieves goals and “feels right.”

*Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk,” Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2 (1979).
 

Page-end bullet